the professional leader like university objective

Author:
Gogorza L.M.
Faculty of Cs Veterinary - UNCPBA TANDIL
www.lidiagogorza.mascotia.com
to gogorzalidia@ciudad.com.ar

To form a leadership conscience that incorporates values, I put and aspirations of the realities of our nation, contribute to preserve the cultural diversity and to use the genuine resources of the situation that offers the reference frame in which the professional must integrate itself.
To recover the resources like integral part of the culture and to turn it a legitimate way of expression of its own values and aspirations, are to recover the capacity of social decision, capacity that must arise from the university training.
The University must far better obtain an advantage of the capacity of the professionals like determining factor in the change of attitudes, instead of forming specialists who know and only handle the technologies created by advanced countries, and that is sent to the outside to learn to handle new processes that employees to their return make use foreign techniques, without having the opportunity to make a truely creative task.
In order to release this potential source of creation it is necessary to change to some old habits of the university community, among them, the one that is attributed habitually to the experience in the allocation of tasks, breaking with the conventional criteria and confronting the risks that it means. The university is a fundamental factor in the innovation possibility; it is the beginning of a chain of changes and incorporation of human and technical factors, based on social goals.

Sometimes, when professionals with a scientific profile prepare themselves that is not the one that the society needs, takes place its emigration. He says himself then, in the student scope, no that there is to produce for the emigration. Perhaps exposition has to resist it, since it is a social problem that the University can raise, but not to solve.
WHAT YES IT CAN MAKE the UNIVERSITY, is to create a responsible conscience in the graduated one, that jeopardizes it with the future of its earth, preparing it to adapt to situations in which it must raise strategies to integrate the ?scientist-technological civilization? to the REAL TRUTH that their own characteristics grant to him.
To form described personnel is perhaps the central problem of all educative system. The human resources properly prepared are the base for the capacity of decision, interpretation, negotiation, determination and audit of the systems, programs and processes that interest to the national problems. All is facets of a central problem that is the USE of the knowledge.

The plans establish the goals, and the forms to reach them. The described existence of personnel assures the human resource necessary to carry out these plans. But the work is sterile if it is not counted on suitable sources of intelligence. We have already indicated that the planning problem is a knowledge problem, and the knowledge is not another thing that the data properly processed, evaluated and adapted to the different situations that frame the project.
I raise of national programs he is complex, and it requires of the necessity to look for new conceptions, that they allow us to take advantage of the existing knowledge and regional strategies, complementing this knowledge to the generated one by the general information. This double challenge only can be faced through own and particular solutions for each situation, concensuadas, having to leave preconceived ideas.

For that reason, according to Klimovsky (1971) it must be considered that all rational action estimates knowledge, but a general knowledge that indicate correlations, ties and guidelines that govern the structure of the real thing. Without this knowledge, it would not exist technical successful. For the development of programs, this knowledge must be framed in pedagogía ?problematizadora? of Paulo Freire, like a empático process, opened, cuestionador of the social and cultural interrelations, adopting new positions as opposed to each problem.

Which is our proposal?
Like part of this change, a dynamic method of work sets out here, in which the interpersonal relations play a decisive role, and where the University values in the formation of professionals the attitude of leadership able to exert a situacional leadership (more fort and personalista at certain moments, weaker and imperceptible in others) reinvindicando the participativo style, and insisting that the leaders are born and they become, because exactly, ?it makes? the conjugación of the group will and its own will.
He is advisable in this sense, to promote and to develop instances of analysis, discussion, debates, agreement, and precise boundary of the disensos, between the parts that commit in them integration process, looking for one better distribution and use of the assigned resources.

The analysis of problems of facts in a group, can be a very beneficial experience in the measurement that this helps to improve the group process, the fulfillment of tasks and consequently, the profit of the learnings.
The diverse reactions (favorable and unfavorable) that originates I raise of a problem in a group dynamics, allow the sprouting of favorable attitudes later, in individual when between the participants of the group an stimulation with arguments begins on the subject. This tends to be more sure fast and strong when or there are some who have experienced some type of coexistence or previous project of these programs. This fact is very important and indicates the existence of a social learning that takes place spontaneously when the opportunity offers, or to the information and the corresponding stimuli occur, and indicates an enormous potential that could be object of a planned development.
In addition, it reaffirms another important lesson: it is not possible to analyze the reality without modifying it.
A simple question - and much more, the analysis and the discussion of their answer can take to reflections that have an effect corrector on the previous conceptions. But, for the formation of leaders, there is a more important learning still: the work of persuasion, that will allow him to gain a determining support of the participants of the group.

The dynamic ones have been thought for the educative atmosphere or the enterprise scope, but today its effectiveness is known in any instance of encounter or group meeting. This social learning only can be made in partial form in the activity of university formation, because it is a process that responds to the practical confrontation of the problems fundamentally that presents/displays the daily activity of the professional in its means.
So that the previous thing can be made specific, an action commitment is required of the real actors, who suitably understand the perspective of evolution, as well as importance and possibilities to take part in the process.

Advantages and limitations of the university knowledge
It agrees to think that the professional futures form in a handling of science in narrow relation with the method, and the results that are obtained from him. Nevertheless, this entails to a unit of more traditional analysis, the discipline, that puts emphasis in the objects in study. As the objects change as they make the theories scientific, he is preferable to orient the formation of the professional to think about the basic problems that they orient the different lines of thought.
The scientific thought is privative of that creates it, and it is only transformed into social property when communicates it. Generally this knowledge we associated it with the truth, but for the vulgar language, the word truth is used with different senses, and includes all the possible distances between the truth of our thought and the truth that really exists in the universe.

Aristotle really talked about then the concept, looking for a form to adapt it between the thought and the reality. This meaning turns out to us very advisable to include/understand that there is behind a scientific concept when we took it like ?knowledge from facts?
When a professional must assume positions of leadership in a social group, she will have to discriminate between facts, realities and knowledge of the reference frame, to be able to decide whereupon methods or procedures she will be gotten to fulfill in more efficient form the objective of his program of work. To explain facts that happen in a community or that is related to him by the social actors, can mean, indeed, that a singular fact is not accidental or independent of the others, but that comprises of sequence of facts that interact by causal factors of that surroundings.

The difficulty to get to come off itself car-referring existential weathers and (previous episodes, theoretical concepts) prevents to catch the dynamics of a total and permanent interdependence. To focus the actions with a flexible spirit, to participate in form articulated with the remaining social systems, and to fortify the integration processes, will allow the leader to get to reconceptualizar the observations, being looked for to detect laws that approach it the reality, and regularities that tie or relate different types from events or events.

Otras secciones interesantes...
Diseases - Nutrition and Feeding - News and Events - Hunting - Alternative diets - Alternative Medicine - Heart disorders - Hormonal disorders - Urology disorders - Alternative diets - Older Cats - Clinical Analysis - Parasites - Hematology disorders - Normal values of laboratory -